Dorsal Path = Male, Ventral Path = Female. Is it true?

Get to Know the Two Main Lines of the Visual System

The human visual system does not stop at the retina. After light is captured by the light-sensitive cells in the retina of the eye, the information is transmitted to the brain through various processing stages.

Since classic research in the 1980s and 1990s, scientists have recognized two main pathways of visual processing:

Ventral Path (What Pathway)

The ventral pathway runs from the primary visual cortex to the inferior temporal area. Its functions are mainly related to object identification, face recognition, color recognition, and shape and detail analysis. Because it is related to object identity, this path is often referred to as a path what pathwayor what is being viewed.

For example, when someone sees a blue-eyed human baby and immediately recognizes it as a blue-eyed baby, the ventral pathway plays a major role in this process.

Dorsal Path (Where/How Pathway)

The dorsal pathway runs to the parietal lobe. Its functions include movement perception, space perception, object positioning, and visual-motor coordination. Because it is related to location and action, this pathway is often referred to as the where pathway or how pathway.

When a basketball athlete catches a flying ball or a driver avoids a fast-moving vehicle, the dorsal pathway plays a major role in guiding the action.

Do Men and Women Have Different Visual Pathways?

The short answer is, not in the sense of having anatomically distinct pathways.

Both males and females have a retina, optic nerve, primary visual cortex, ventral pathway, and dorsal pathway. All of these components are a normal part of the human visual system.

There are no anatomical studies showing that females have small to insignificantly smaller dorsal pathways, or that males have underdeveloped ventral pathways.

In other words, both sexes use both pathways simultaneously.

Where Did This Claim Come From?

This claim likely comes from a number of studies that found differences in average performance tendencies on certain visual tasks.

Statistically, a number of studies do show that men often score higher on 3D spatial navigation and mental rotation tasks, while women often perform better on facial recognition, emotional expression, and some color discrimination tasks.

However, differences in performance do not automatically mean that one visual pathway is dominated exclusively by one sex.

In modern neuroscience, behavioral differences do not necessarily reflect large-scale anatomical differences in specific neural pathways.

The differences found by the research are more statistical in nature

What is often misunderstood is the meaning of the words “better” or “more dominant”.

For example, one study found that men excelled on average at spatial navigation tasks. That doesn’t mean all men are superior, all women are less superior, or that women’s dorsal pathways are not functioning optimally.

The distribution of human abilities is highly overlapping (overlapping). In much cognitive psychology research, the ranges of abilities of men and women overlap greatly. This means that a particular woman may be far superior at a spatial task than most men.

What about the influence of hormones?

Some scientists suspect that sex hormones play a role in shaping certain tendencies during brain development. Estrogen and testosterone are known to influence neuron growth, synapse formation, and brain plasticity

However, the relationship between hormones and dorsal or ventral pathway dominance is far from definitive. Many research results are inconsistent between one study and another.

Therefore, researchers are generally more cautious and prefer to talk about average tendencies rather than stating a strict separation of functions by sex.

Is it true that men’s eyes are dominated by rod cells and women’s eyes are dominated by cone cells?

This is the second claim that often circulates.

To answer that, it is first necessary to understand the two main types of photoreceptors on the retina.

Stem Cells

Rod cells function primarily for vision in dim conditions, motion detection, and night vision. Its characteristics are that it is very sensitive to light and cannot distinguish colors well. The number of rod cells in the human retina is very large, around 120 million.

Cone Cell

Cone cells function for color vision, high visual acuity, and detailed vision. The number is around 6 million. There are three main types of cone cells that are sensitive to different wavelengths, allowing humans to see various colors.

Are Male and Female Retinas Different?

The research did find some interesting biological differences. A number of studies show that women tend to have slightly better color sensitivity, are better at distinguishing certain color variations, and have an advantage on some color discrimination tasks.

In contrast, some studies have found that men may show higher sensitivity to moving objects or certain contrasts.

However, this does not mean that the male retina contains more rod cells and the female retina contains dramatically more cone cells.

Until now, there is no scientific consensus which states that the male retina is dominated by rod cells while the female retina is dominated by cone cells. This claim is an oversimplification of much more complex findings.

Why Are Women Often Better at Differentiating Colors?

One interesting hypothesis relates to genetics. The red and green color receptor genes are located on the X chromosome.

Women have two X chromosomes, while men only have one. As a result, women have a greater opportunity to have a wider variety of color receptors.

In very rare cases, there are even women who are suspected of having the ability tetrachromacynamely the ability to distinguish a wider spectrum of colors than most humans (for example infrared and ultraviolet). However, this condition does not represent the entire female population.

What About Vision Movement in Men?

Several studies have found that men are on average more sensitive to fast-moving visual stimuli.

There are hypotheses linking this to a more responsive magnocellular system, the influence of the hormone testosterone during development, and evolutionary adaptations related to the hunting nature of men in the past.

However, evolutionary hypotheses like this are still a matter of discussion and cannot be considered final facts.

What Does Modern Research Say?

When all the scientific evidence is put together, the picture that emerges is much more complex than the simple slogan that dorsal pathway = male and ventral pathway = female.

The facts that are relatively supported by data are:

Research Supported:

1) Men and women may show mean differences on some visual tasks.

2) Women often perform better on specific color discrimination tasks.

3) Men often perform better on some spatial tasks.

4) Hormones and genetic factors may influence the development of the visual system.

What’s Not Scientifically Supported:

1) The dorsal pathway is only dominant in males.

2) The ventral pathway is only dominant in women.

3) The male eye is dominated by rod cells.

4) Women’s eyes are dominated by cone cells.

5) The visual differences between men and women are absolute.

CONCLUSION

The claim that the dorsal pathway is the male visual pathway while the ventral pathway is the female visual pathway is a gross oversimplification of the available scientific evidence.

Both sexes have dorsal and ventral pathways that are equally important in processing visual information. There are some mean differences in performance on certain tasks, such as spatial ability and color discrimination, but these differences are not sufficient to conclude that one visual pathway is owned or dominated exclusively by one sex.

Likewise, the claim that men’s eyes are dominated by rod cells and women’s eyes are dominated by cone cells. Until now there is no scientific consensus that supports this statement. There are some subtle differences in visual sensitivity and color perception that are influenced by genetic, hormonal and neurodevelopmental factors.

In other words, if there is a statement that the dorsal pathway = male and the ventral pathway = female, the scientific answer is no. These claims are oversimplified and do not reflect the true complexity of the human visual system.

SOURCE

Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1)20–25.

Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2018). The visually guided brain(2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Halpern, D. F. (2012). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). Psychology Press.

McGuinness, D., & Pribram, K. H. (1979). The origins of sensory bias in the development of gender differences in perception and cognition. Psychological Review, 86(5)422–444.

Murray, I. J., Parry, N. R. A., Carden, D., & Kulikowski, J. J. (2012). Sex-related differences in peripheral human color vision: A color matching study. Journal of Vision, 12(1)18.

Snowden, R. J., Thompson, P., & Troscianko, T. (2012). Basic vision: An introduction to visual perception (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2)250–270.

Ware, C. (2020). Information visualization: Perception for design (4th ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.

Wong, W. I., & Hines, M. (2015). Interpreting gender differences in spatial abilities: A critical review. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(8)2041–2053.

Yuan, J., He, Y., Qinglin, Z., Chen, A., & Li, H. (2008). Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory control: ERP evidence from a two-choice oddball task. Psychophysiology, 45(6)986–993.